Tonight at church we had a Doubt Night. We don't normally have evening services but once a month there is a special "outreach" event. Tonight, Charles and Steve were a panel and people asked questions (ahead of time) about doubting and Christianity, theology, etc. It was fantastic. There was a small, but good group. We had some really intense dialog, which is something I have been really craving. I love deep discussions and life, reality and the Lord. There were questions of God vs. Science, of the importance of theology in our lives, of whether or not you have to go to church to be a Christian, etc. Really, really good. It will give me some things to think about for awhile. We only got through half the questions. We could have been there all night. That would have been awesome. :)
Today I was thinking a bit about the Wesleyan church. For the most part, I really like the Wesleyan church. I like their idea of Christian Perfection, I like how they have, in the past, stood up against things like slavery... But there are a few things that I don't really like. And this isn't true about every Wesleyan church I've been in, and I see it more in the Australian churches than American churches, but I see it none-the-less.
We seem to be stuck.
We have broken away from liturgical services but we haven't really continued to change and evolve with the culture. Not that I love mega-churches and seeker sensitive churches all about singing trite songs and hearing a 30 minutes sermon on why we should give our money to the church while hearing a 10 minute topical sermon about how our culture is going to hell, and us with it, if we don't change our ways. But times are changing. People are changing. Thoughts about God and theology are changing - starting to go back to the model of the early church - going back to what the original text was about, and seeing where we have gotten off track. Style of music is changing. I see that here. There are churches here that are full of teens and young adults and families. And there are reasons why they are full. It's because they are changing to meet the changing needs of people in today's society.
Yet, many Wesleyan churches are so resistant to change.
And yet, it's not like we are stuck in years of old, wonderful, thought out liturgy. We are stuck in the 70's. I believe in Australia this is more of an issue because that is when the Wesleyan Methodist Church first appeared in Australia. Therefore, founding members of these churches are still alive. Administration, etc. has not yet changed hands. Well, it has started, but the founders hold a lot of power. And therefore, because this is what they know and love, it hasn't changed. And there is nothing wrong with tradition. I love tradition. I love hymns. I believe there is value in this. But I also see how failure to evolve and change really damages a church. And I'm not speaking of any church in particular. I'm speaking broadly of many churches here.
But I think we are missing something. Hope Wesleyan is a very refreshing church because it
is trying to meet the needs of the community. It's trying to be a worshiping, caring community concerned with depth in teaching and discipleship and taking God's love to the streets. Really good things.
But even that is lacking something. And I think that in trying to be "modern" and "flexible" and "easy-going" and attempting to make things "comfortable" for new-comers (those are my words, and I love Hope, so please don't be offended anyone. I don't think any of those are bad things, I'm just trying to say what I'm feeling.), I think we lose a sense of awe... of reverence... of worshiping as a Body and not individuals. There is something so sacred about corporate prayer. And responsive readings. And corporate responses (such as "This is the Word of the Lord." "Thanks be to God.")
(One really positive note for Australian Wesleyan churches is that they serve communion once a month rather than once a quarter. I think this is fabulous!)
Maybe what I'm yearning for is the perfect church, and maybe that doesn't exist. (Well, I'm sure it doesn't!) But I crave a church that appreciates ancient and sacred liturgy, while desiring to meet the needs of the whole congregation - old and young. I want a church that does responsive readings, recites old prayers, the Creed and the Lord's Prayer together, takes communion with the understanding of it as a corporate spiritual discipline, a place where Christ meets with His Bride and imparts grace to us. I want a church where we sings hymns and choruses - where we aren't afraid to bring in drums and a few guitars - where many people can use their gifts, not for performance, but for worship of God who gave those gifts. I want to be a part of a church where worship isn't about what
I get out of the service or whether or not
I like the style of preaching or singing but it's about what we can do to make God's heart sing. I want a church where the pastor preaches from Scripture - not culture - and seeks to draw people into the narrative, into our role in God's story, not only as individuals, but as a church. I want to be in a church where people love, respect and encourage each other. I want to be in a church that will welcome prostitutes, teenage mothers and drunkards and love them, rather than whisper/gossip about them and sit in judgment on them. I want to be a part of a church that actively works to feed hungry and clothe the naked, rather than sitting around in our big churches and comfortable homes talking about being Jesus to the world.
I want to be in a church where people aren't afraid to talk about Jesus, where people invite others to church, whether they come or not. Where people aren't embarrassed to be a Christian or too lazy/nonchalant to be bothered with stepping out of our comfort zone and reaching out to someone. I want to be in a church that is passionate about spreading the gospel.
(Tangent - I think that's a lot of our problem. In the early church, they were under the impression that Jesus was coming back soon and there was a sense of urgency. They had this incredible knowledge and they had to tell as many people as they could, because they might run out of time. Well, 2000 years later, it's like we suspect we have all the time in the world. We don't have the same initiative, even though we should. In talking with Phil last night I realized how stupid we really are. The apostles were preaching like crazy, despite ridiculous persecution, because they wanted to share Jesus with as many people as they could before he returned. What about me? What if Jesus doesn't come back in my lifetime? What excuse do I have? What if I feel like Jesus isn't coming back now, so, it's okay, I still I have time. But when I get to heaven and Jesus says to me, "I didn't come back during your lifetime. Instead, I gave you your
whole lifetime to tell people about me. What did you do with it?" Man, will I be ashamed. So really, we have no excuse at all. Ok - end of tangent.)
I want to be in a church full of people who are considerate, who are good neighbors, who are honest and hard-workers, who aren't hypocrites, who "walk the walk as well as talk the talk" as the cliche goes. I just want to be in a church that is what the Lord created and intended us to be. I want to be the Church - the Body, the hands and feet - the Bride of Christ.
In Doubt Night, one statement came up about a bumper sticker or magnet or something that said "Jesus, please protect me from your followers." And another man brought up a survey that was taken in New York where they asked people who they would least like to have as neighbors and the #1 answer was Christians. That is so awful. We should be the BEST neighbors.
Being in churches my whole life (and I grew up in a fantastic church!) this seems so impossible. But it's what the Lord calls us to.
I suppose that's the end of my ranting and raving. If you stuck it out, g'donya. I'd be interested in your thoughts.
For now, adios.